| ........... |
.
.
.
|
Do
immigrants assimilate faster where there is a policy of "Melting Pot" than
where there is a policy of "Mosaic?"
|
.
| The question
about whether the policies of two host countries, melting pot or mosaic,
have any effect on rates of assimilation, uses Canada and the USA for comparison. |
.
| Usually assimilation
of migrants takes a similar pattern through generations, although the rate
or speed of change may vary. |
.
| The incoming
or migrating generation struggles to survive in the new environment (especially
if there is a difference in language), and retains many of the values and
behaviour patterns of their society of origin. |
.
| The second
generation, being socialised at school as much as at home, tends to rebel
against the home culture, and often over identifies with the host culture. |
.
| This may continue
into the third generation, or may be the beginning of a new set of values,
which tends to romanticise the culture of origin and adapt values and behaviour
which reflect that romanticisation more than the real culture of the original
society. |
.
| That variation
in rate appears to be more a function of the nature of the host culture,
brought by the migrants, than the policies of the host culture. |
.
| This
is the conclusion of Stanford Lyman who studied the issue. |
.
| Be aware that
"melting pot" does not mean all immigrants unilaterally convert to some
monolithic mainstream American society. |
.
| When
you mix the colours yellow and red, you get neither yellow nor red, but
orange. |
.
| A melting pot
policy expected that mainstream American society itself would also change
as a result of the melting of so many different cultures. |
.
| Also, a "mosaic"
policy did not mean the total keeping of everything cultural from societies
of origin. |
.
| It meant also
immigrants needed to learn how to live and operate in the mainstream culture,
and that meant learning one of the mainstream languages, and also to live
according to the laws and customs of the host country when those varied
from the laws and customs of the societies of origin. |
.
| What
has this got to do with variations in family life? |
.
| We cannot say
that families are the same or different in the USA and Canada, because
in both places there is no monolithic or orthodox family. |
.
| There
is a range of family composition and dynamics in both the USA and Canada. |
.
| The nuclear
family as an ideal, with women working at home and men working outside
the home, is promoted by religious conservatives (of various theologies)
in both places. |
.
| Variations,
including same sex partners, single parents, common law marriage, and others,
appear in both places. |
.
| Variations
tend to be in rates or degrees (and are minor) rather than qualitative
variations. |
.
| Families of
new immigrants tend to be similar to what they were in their societies
of origin, with variations from that in later generations, or after some
time has passed in first generations. |
––»«––
|
