..
| Simply
put, the political dimension of culture and society is all about power. |
.
| Whereas
politics and political science include discussions about other things,
such as political ideologies, the political dimension of society is limited
to power, and leaves ideology to the values dimension of culture. |
.
| Political
parties are institutions, and belong to the institutional or interactional
dimension. |
.
| As
with all six cultural dimensions, and the physical dimensions of length,
width and depth, the political dimension is a construct, based upon reason
rather than observation, and exists in our heads. |
.
| It
is not intrinsic in culture, nor is it an aspect of culture; it is a dimension. |
.
| As
when we have“two” apples, the “twoness” is not intrinsic in the
apples, but in our minds |
.
| Power
is one of the three elements, along with prestige and wealth, of
social inequality or class, studied by sociologists. |
.
| The
political dimension is in any social or cultural entity, from the smallest
interaction, as in a dyad (two people), to a whole country. |
.
| As
when a pencil may be short or long, it always has a length, so small or
large groups or institutions have a political dimension. |
.
| Symbolic
interactionists prefer to study at the micro level, small groups, and the
exercise of power in them. |
.
| While
functionalists and conflict sociologists both look at the macro level,
their approaches differ widely. |
.
| The
functionalists see the national political system as it appears on the surface,
a set of institutions which tend to balance groups competing for power,
so national decisions reflect the values of the majority. |
.
| Conflict
sociologists see a “power elite,” composed mainly of leaders in corporations,
who hold most of the power, often in a hidden manner. |
.
| The
aim of the power elite is to maintain a system of privilege for those at
the top of the country’s class system. |
.
| Two
or three friends are walking on the street. |
.
| As
they approach a junction, one suggests that they turn onto another street. |
.
| The
person making the suggestion is trying to exercise power. |
.
| Whether
they turn or not indicates the amount of power held at the time by the
friend making the suggestion |
.
| We
call small informal groups (as in your friends on the street) and bands
(usually found in gathering and hunting societies) that have no formal
permanent leader as “acephalous” (meaning “headless”). Leadership
is informal, temporary and ephemeral. |
.
| Canada
makes a national decision in choosing its prime minister. |
.
| All
the events that come into play − party meetings, campaigns, voting −
relate to the political dimension, in that one person is chosen who will
have that large amount of power. |
.
| We
can gain a better understanding of our political dimension if we see how
it has been built up and put together over the millennia. |
.
| As
with most social change, political development
has tended to be cumulative: new things are added onto the old rather than
replacing the old. |
.
| The
old things may continue so long as they are not dysfunctional, even if
they are no longer needed. |
.
| In
the simplest societies, the political system is one with little difference
in power acquired by the most powerful, compared to the least powerful. |
.
| It
is very equalitarian in terms of distribution of power. |
.
| As
society becomes more complex, the gap between the least powerful and the
most powerful increases. |
.
| Compare
an informal hunt leader in a gathering society, with a band member with
the least power. |
.
.
| The
gap in Washington, DC, between the president in the White House, and some
janitor in a slum hotel in down town Washington, is immense. |
.
| The
difference between lowest and highest increases with the complexity of
the society. |
.
| The
more informal and equalitarian range of power has not disappeared with
the coming of agriculture then industrial society. |
.
| The
equalitarian and informal power allocation remains in the private and domestic
areas of society, while the hierarchical systems are widest in the public
arenas. |
.
| An
important concern held by sociologists is the difference between legitimate
and non legitimate use of power. |
.
| When
it is legitimate it is called authority, and when not, it is called coercion. |
.
| Since
the origin of cities and states, brought on by the agrarian revolution,
the head of state, usually a king at first, has monopolized the use of
legitimate force. |
.
| That
is why the military and police are closely associated with government,
and many regiments in the Commonwealth are named “The King’s own .
. .,” reflecting this history. |
.
| An
important reason for this is that violence, or more importantly, the threat
of violence, has been a useful and efficient manner of exercising power. |
.
| As
Mao Tse Tung said, “Power comes out of the barrel of a gun.” |
.
| Politics
and the military have always held a special relationship with each other
in the history of humans. |
.
| War
has often been used over the history of humanity, since the agricultural
revolution, to achieve political objectives. |
.
| See
the paper on religion. Although on the surface,
the large number of wars based on religion appear to be conflicts over
beliefs, closer analysis reveals political purposes. |
.
| Conflict
sociologists see police as part of a justice system which has the main
purpose of oppressing the poor and underprivileged. |
.
| Political
scientists see three types of national political systems, monarchies, democracies,
and dictatorships (including oligarchies). |
.
| For
the most part, these are all systems of allocating power within a state,
and difference between them is a difference in succession, how new leaders
are chosen when the old ones die or are overthrown. |
.
| When
succession is peaceful and ordered, the state will more likely remain stable. |
.
| Weber
saw three different types of authority. |
.
| “Charismatic”
is power based on the personality of the individual. |
.
| “Traditional”
power is based on the legitimacy of the succession laws. |
.
| “Bureaucratic”
power is based on the rational rules for choosing a successor (salute the
rank, not the individual wearing it). |
.
| The
word democracy derives from the Latin language, “demo” meaning “the
people”, and “cracy” meaning “power.” |
.
| The
slogan “power to the people” is really a cry for democracy. |
.
| The
suffix, “archie” derives from the Greek, and also means power. |
.
| A
monarchy is rule by one (the king or queen) and “oli” (as in oligarchy)
means few. |
.
| In
a European monarchy, when the king or queen dies, succession is usually
by traditional means, eg first born male is automatically selected. |
.
| (This
is different in Akan matrilineal societies,
where the new leader is chosen from the matrilineage which owns the office
of king, chief, or elder; succession is not automatic). |
.
| Succession
to dictatorships or oligarchies is usually be military force, while succession
in democracies is usually by rational legal means, such as through elections. |
.
| Our
parliamentary system is called “representational democracy” which is
an oxymoron. |
.
| When
people vote, they give up power to the person or persons elected, and no
longer have direct involvement of the decisions affecting the nation or
state. |
.
| Direct
democracy implies that everybody continues to be involved in the decision
making, but that is impractical in large, complex societies, and can be
practised only in very small groups, clubs, villages, residential communes
and associations. |
.
| On
the world scene, we see two forces moving in different directions. |
.
| On
one side we see a movement to a global economy as capitalism replaces socialism. |
.
| On
the other side, we see a growth of strong (some may say fanatic) nationalism
or localism. |
.
..... |