..
.
| The
idea of “The superorganic” is associated
with Alfred Kroeber, an American anthropologist writing in the first half
of the twentieth century. |
.
| The
superorganic is another way of describing − and understanding − culture
or the socio-cultural system. |
.
| If
we start with the inorganic, it is the physical universe, all the atoms
of elements without life. |
.
| We
can call this the lowest level of complexity. |
.
| The
second level of complexity is composed of living things. |
.
| All
living things, plants and animals, are built up of inorganic elements,
mainly hydrogen, oxygen and carbon, plus some trace elements. |
.
| Here
we use an interesting phrase, “The whole is greater than the sum of its
parts.” |
.
| The
collection of inorganic elements which we call, for example, a tree, or
a dog, is living. |
.
| If
you analyse all those parts, in themselves, or even as a collection, they
are not living. |
.
| The
arrangement makes them alive. |
.
| If
you separate the dog or tree into its separate elements, it dies. |
.
| Knowing
the dynamics of how carbon atoms operate, or that combining hydrogen and
oxygen can result in a rapid combustion if not an explosion, does not explain
how the tree works, with its leaves converting sunlight into energy to
change water and carbon dioxide into oxygen and carbon, channels to transfer
sap from leaves to root, and so on. |
.
| Similarly,
the dog, if seen as a biological system, operates at a higher complexity
than the inorganic elements which comprise it. |
.
| A
living entity transcends its inorganic parts. |
.
| Looking
at the relationship between living things and their inorganic components
in this way helps us to understand the relationship between culture and
persons. |
.
| Culture
and society comprise the third level. |
.
| Human
beings are animals, and as such are organic systems. |
.
| They
have developed communications between themselves to an elaborate degree,
much more sophisticated than other animals. |
.
| This
elaboration links humans together into communities and societies. |
.
| The
links are symbolic, not genetic as in biological systems. |
.
| The
socio-economic level, culture or society, therefore is carried by humans
and transcends humans. |
.
| A
culture has a “life of its own” which is symbolic rather than genetic.
In this way it is a “living” thing. |
.
| It
operates at a higher level of complexity than the organic. It is
superorganic. |
.
| There
is a parallel, therefore, in the relations between the inorganic and the
organic, as between the organic and the superorganic. |
.
| The
concept developed by Durkheim, a “social fact,”
is expressed in this understanding. |
.
| Humans
have thoughts and behaviour. |
.
| Those
are carried by individuals. |
.
| They
behave, however, in concert with each other, as a system external to individuals
− society. |
.
| Do
not think of a dog as a carbon atom or a hydrocarbon molecule. |
.
| Similarly,
do not think of a community, an institution, a society as a human being. |
.
.
| It
may have a life of its own, but its life more resembles an amoeba than
a human. |
. |