..
| The
aesthetic values dimension of culture is a structure of ideas, sometimes
paradoxical, inconsistent, or contradictory, that people have about good
and bad, about beautiful and ugly, and about right and wrong. |
.
| They
are the justifications that people cite to explain their actions and interaction. |
.
| The
three axes along which people make judgements are all dependent upon what
they learn from childhood. |
.
| These
include judging between right and wrong, between good and bad, and between
beautiful and ugly, all based upon social and community values. |
.
| They
are not acquired through our genes, but through our socialization. |
.
| That
implies that they can be relearned; that we could change our judgements. |
.
| Because
we are animals, however, and learn different things at different stages,
we should not assume than something learned can be unlearned. |
.
| Values
are incredibly difficult to change in a community, especially if residents
perceive that an attempt is being made to change them. |
.
| They
do change, as community standards evolve, but that change can not be rushed
or guided through outside influence or by conscious manipulation. |
.
| Shared
community standards are important in community and personal identity; who
one is very much is a matter of what values in which one believes. |
.
| The
degree to which community or organizational members share values, and/or
respect each others' values, is an important component among the sixteen
elements of strength and capacity. |
.
| Values
tend to change as the community grows more complex, more heterogeneous,
more connected to the world. |
.
| Changes
in values tend to result more from changes in technology and changes in
social organisation, and less from preaching or lecturing for direct
changes. |
.
| It
appears that there is no overall direction of values change in human history,
that judgements become more liberal, more tolerant, more catholic, more
eclectic ― or less ― as societies become more complex and sophisticated. |
.
| Communities
at either end of the social complexity spectrum display standards of various
degrees or rigidity. |
.
| In
spite of that range across all communities, within any community there
is usually a narrow range of values among residents. |
.
| Urban
and heterogeneous communities tend to have a wider variation in values
and aesthetics |
.
| Communities
that are more complex and that have a wider gap of inequality (hierarchical)
tend to have a wider range of prestige assigned to people. |
.
| It
is not easy to predict the value standards of any community before you
go to live there and to find out how to operate within the community. |
.
| Because
of their importance, however, it is necessary that you, the social researcher
or mobilizer, learn as much as you can about community standards, and do
not assume that they will be the same as your own. |
.
|