THIS PAGE HAS BEEN MOVED
If you are not redirected to its new location in a few seconds, please click here
DON'T FORGET TO UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS!
USING THE DIMENSIONS IN FAMILY RESEARCH
Ordering your observations
Training Handout
How Can We Use the Six Dimensions In Designing Family Research?
Take some of the material about
the
six dimensions and do research,
and go beyond, putting in your own analysis and reasoning (not mere opinions).
The best description of the six dimensions are in the paper:
What is Community?
Foremost, the six dimensions as a set provide
a way of organising research data. Since cultural data belong to one or
another of the six dimensions, you can examine what you are collecting,
or plan (intend) to collect, and ask if they are balanced between
the dimension.
The six dimensions can be used as a checklist
to ensure that all the social and cultural features of each studied family
are recognised.
To the degree that families have elements in
common, the six dimensions can be used to make information comparable (not
necessarily the same) between them.
As Baker (2005) points out, there is a
microstructural
bias in most family literature. Using the six dimensions allows for
a means of counteracting that bias.
The six dimensions can be used as a base for
identifying more specific features of your research. Those may
vary.
Referring to the six dimensions, and what each
includes, the researcher can be directed to specific questions.
In the sense that a family is like a community
and is like a society in itself, it must (by definition) have all six dimensions.
All six are therefore valid for doing research.
Be careful not to say that the researcher must
include all six dimensions. While it is logically true that removing one
dimension by definition will remove all dimensions, that applies to the
family (culture) but not to research. It is not an argument for including
all dimensions in the research.
It would be OK to list all six dimensions,
but you were not asked to define or describe the cultural dimensions as
such. You were asked how they would be applied in research design. The
following looks at how each dimension might be used in that
research design.
Technological Dimension: How does the human constructed material
environment (house, furniture, utensils) contribute to family dynamics?
How is it affected by family dynamics? How has the broader (societal) technology
and its changes affected the structure and organisation of the
family?
Economic Dimension: How is
wealth (anything scarce and useful) allocated within the family? How does
the wider economy affect the family? What is the overall family income?
Does it come from only one member? Two? If so, is it distributed equally
? or by what principles?
Political Dimension: How is
power and influence allocated and exercised within the family? What effect
does the political dimension in the wider society have on the internal
structure and dynamics of the family? Is there any evidence of recent changes?
If so, how did they come about and what are the implications?
Interactional dimension: With
the microstructural bias in family literature, this is the dimension that
is most affected. As well as the roles and relationships within the family,
however, you can also ask what class is the family within the wider society,
and does that affect the family? What other roles does the family play
in society, and what are its relationships with the rest of society outside
it, and with individuals outside the family?
The
Values and Aesthetics
Dimension: The research can ask if all members of the family share the
same values. (Does dad like hip hop or rap?) What is the level of prestige
of the family as a whole, and how is that affected by individuals within
it? Do family members share political ideology? Are values and aesthetics
discussed or taken for granted? How do community standards and social values
affect those within the family? Are they aligned?
Worldview: Do all family members
attend the same religious services? Are they members of the same religious
organisation? Do they share the same beliefs about cosmology. Does the
family pray together (and stay together)?
The document on using the six dimensions
for community research
can provide a few guidelines for using them for family research, especially
since the differences between family and community are becoming
more blurred.
The kinds of questions asked here
are wide and varied. They are generated by taking each
dimension
-- and asking what might be sociologically important in it. What
is it in that dimension which affects the structure and organisation of
a family?
These are some ways
how the six dimensions can be used in family research design.
Here again is the list of six dimensions -- in historical perspective:
Reference Cited:
Baker, Maureen, editor
2005
Families:
Changing Trends in Canada, Fifth Edition.
Toronto: McGraw-Hill
Ryerson
––»«––
If you copy text from this site, please acknowledge the author(s)
and link it back to www.cec.vcn.bc.ca
This site is hosted through the Community Development Society (CDS)
By the Vancouver Community Network (VCN)
© Copyright 1967, 1987, 2007 Phil Bartle Web Design by Lourdes Sada
––»«––Last update:
2011.08.16
|