..
.
....
| The
word “deviance” is related the root for “deviate” which means to
wander off track. In sociology, our concern is just as much with
what keeps people on the line as it is about people getting off it. |
.
| A
deviation is a violation of a social norm. The question then is just
as much, “Why do we have and observe social norms?” as “Why do we
break them?” |
.
| What
is the difference between deviance and crime? Both are violations
of social norms. A crime has an added characteristic in that a law has
been passed against it, making it a crime or criminal offence. Not
everything illegal is criminal; a parking ticket is not a criminal offence;
driving while intoxicated is. |
.
| Forces
for Keeping Us Inside the Lines: |
....
| We
start our search by considering control. Social organisation means
that people behave in predictable patterns, with variety, perhaps, but
within some boundaries. So the sociological question is how are people
kept within those boundaries? |
.
| When
people see individuals behaving outside the norm, in both senses (mathematical
and sociological), they tend to do things that not only reflect their judgement,
but also tend to be aimed at affecting the individuals engaged in the deviation.
One response is to exclude them from some social interaction.
Punishment. This can amount to bigotry, and can include removing
rights of the individuals. Another response is to engage in behaviour
aimed at bringing the deviant individual in line, to change her or his
behaviour so as to conform to the norms of the community. |
.
| The
behaviour of other people can be a set of forces that keep us in line.
Their responses to our actions can be as positive and negative sanctions,
rewards and punishments. Carrot and stick. If we act within
their boundaries of expectations and preferences, we are rewarded, and
if we stray we are punished. |
.
| Because
we are socialised the way we are, our assumptions about what other people
are thinking affects how we act. Those sanctions, positive and negative,
can work on us not even by how others respond, but because of our assumptions
about how others might respond. |
.
| The
difference between deviance and crime is that crime is a social deviance
for which a law has been passed to forbid it, and for the state to punish
someone who breaks the taboo. That difference is basically the difference
between gemeinschaft
and
gesellschaft.
Not every law is fair or based upon the will or consensus of the whole
population, and some actions may be technically illegal yet accepted among
the norms of the people. Some laws are not removed long after they
outlast their usefulness. It is still the law in Vancouver that horses
have the right of way over motor vehicles and pedestrians. Punishment
is the common legal response, but punishment is not a way to end crime,
even in the individual being punished. See Criminal
Sentences. |
.
....
| After
I first was introduced to sociology, I took a course in deviance.
I thought I might learn what a deviant is, how s/he got that way, and what
society did about it. I was surprised to discover that it was not
so important what a deviant was as who had the power to label someone as
a deviant. |
.
| What
constitutes a deviant, where the lines are drawn, differs from culture
to culture, therefore from community to community. The boundary judgements
belong to the judgmental dimension, values. |
.
| If
everyone in the community has exactly the same notion of whether a person
is a deviant or not, then the labelling process would be straight forward.
No disagreement. But it is very rare to find even two persons in
a community with the same precise set of values, let alone everybody in
the community. |
.
| Where
there are differing ideas about where to draw the lines, the community
may recognize the authority of one person or one category of persons, to
decide. The person doing the identification has the power. |
.
| One
mechanism for identifying and responding to persons to be labelled as deviates
is the medicalization of deviance. This is a mental manipulation
which takes the eccentric and suggests that the reason for the aberration
is rooted in disease, or at least incomplete health. It puts a biological
origin on to the situation, an all too common approach in this day of biological
explanations for what are social conditions or situations.
Medicalization of deviance often is a mechanism for putting the power of
identifying a deviate onto those trained in medicine, again putting a biological
“cause” onto deviance. |
.
| Who
has the control and how is it manifested? Who us a deviate?
What is a deviate? These are key questions here. |
.
| One
element of differentiating different kinds and degrees of breaking norms
is what is represented by the difference between harmless eccentricity
versus dangerous crimes. The social response, along a continuum between
those extremes, is a continuity or spectrum also. |
.
| Social
Change and Innovation as Deviance: |
....
| Another
aspect of deviation is its role in social change. Urbanization itself
is social change, and urban communities tend to change more rapidly than
rural ones. However social change may come about, whoever is first
is a deviate − by definition. Invention, discovery and innovation
are all social deviations at first, until they become the accepted social
norms. |
.
| The
classical example about which we learn in secondary school is Galileo,
when he was declared a heretic by the Catholic church, for suggesting that
the earth is not necessarily the centre of the universe, because it goes
around the sun. |
.
| As
mentioned in Notes on Religion, the concept of
nothing as a positive entity and goal was heretical to the church leaders
in the Middle Ages. The Arabs brought the concept of zero along with their
numbering system from India. The first Europeans to use these were
seen as deviants, heretics and criminals in their own communities. |
.
| In
urban industrial and post industrial societies, we value social change
and new inventions, if they are useful. We therefore value creativity
more than in rural societies. Greater creativity causes greater deviance,
and faster social change. It produces more variety of values, which
in turn allows for increased accusations of deviance, and greater culture
conflict between sub cultures in a community. For many reasons, cities
have more deviants than villages or rural areas, per population. |
.
| Overall,
the sociological concern with deviance is not a question of definitions
but one of power. |
.......................................... |