..
| Education
differs from socialisation in that it is, or
is supposed to be, planned, with clear goals set out for what students
learn − a curriculum. |
.
.
| It
is a set of organisations designed to educate young people in society. |
.
| When
children first go to pre school, kindergarten, elementary and secondary
school, they learn new ways of operating, interacting with other students
and staff in a new community, and necessarily must be socialised. |
.
| As
with other secondary socialisation, this aspect of education is not usually
planned, is not particularly part of the curriculum, and tends to be spontaneous
and ad hoc. |
.
| The
experience can produce some anxiety among pupils,
and many schools have councillors who assist children in the required adjustment. |
.
| As
among other institutions of where socialisation takes place, schools contribute
to gender socialisation, with separate bathrooms for boys and girls, dress
codes, and encouragement to take one course or another. |
.
| Fifty
years ago girls were not expected to do well in maths and sciences, and
were urged to take home economics rather than industrial arts. |
.
| Now
there is more emphasis on encouraging girls to do well in the sciences,
and more tolerance for aggressive and unrestrained behaviour by boys, reducing
their saleable skills in society after they leave school. |
.
| An
educational institution is one which creates and magnifies inequality. |
.
| Children
of wealthy parents tend to go to “better” schools which have bigger
budgets and more services. |
.
| The
principle of "equal opportunity" really means the opportunity to compete
and its result is always inequality. It does not produce equality |
.
| Students
are evaluated and graded and higher grades mean greater access to further
educational opportunities, and later to more and better paid jobs. |
.
| In
a complex post industrial society like ours, as in industrial societies,
people usually are not known as whole people, but as the various roles
they play. |
.
.
| Many
employers, therefore, offer jobs on the basis of applicants having certificates
of education, even if the content of that education is not directly related
to the skills and knowledge needed for the offered job. |
.
| We
say, then, that we have a credential society. |
.
| This
means some persons who can do a better job, are not hired while persons
with the needed certificates, perhaps not the same level of ability, get
the job. |
.
| Education
performs a role of “gate keeping.” filtering some people out of access
to some jobs, and letting in others. |
.
.
| We
often distinguish between education and training. |
.
| Education
is the acquisition of knowledge while training is the acquisition of skills,
although there is considerable overlap between them. |
.
| In
my Community Empowerment site, the training provided goes much further
than the usual definition of training. See “Training
as Mobilisation.” |
.
| As
we would expect, sociologists looking at education tend to look at different
things according to the perspective they favour. |
.
| Functionalists
usually look at how education contributes to the functioning of society,
providing training in skills and education in knowledge which help society
to operate. |
.
| Gate
keeping is seen as a necessity to the functioning of a meritocracy. Education
helps in integrating individuals into complex society. |
.
.
| Conflict
sociologists, in contrast, see the role of education in maintaining inequality,
and therefore privilege to some but not others. |
.
| They
see IQ tests as culturally biased, and see unequal funding of schools,
both contributing to inequality and maintenance of the vertical mosaic,
serving the purposes of the power elite. |
.
| They
describe the “hidden curriculum” as things taught in schools but not
written in the curricula, obedience to authority, conformity to mainstream
or bourgeois values, and norms, the Protestant work ethic, and other things
which maintain the support by the middle class for the upper classes. |
.
| As
usual, the symbolic interactionists examine at the micro level, looking
at interactions between pupils, teachers, and any others in the classroom. |
.
| They
find, for example, that teachers often make judgements in the first week
or so, based on subtle hints such as dress, skin and hair, body language
and dialect, and categorise pupils by ethnicity, class and family background. |
.
| On
these they base expectations about how and how well the pupils will do
in school. They then spend much of the remainder of their time ensuring
that these were self justifying prophesies. |
.
| In
the Fall of 2005, teachers in BC went on strike,
deemed illegal because the provincial government passed a law defining
education as an “essential service” making strikes illegal. |
.
| The
first two days of the strike were "legal" because the law had not yet been
passed. The teachers planned to go back to the classroom after their
second day on strike, but decided to stay on strike because the law passed
was in contradiction to the Canadian Constitution and to treaties signed
with the United Nations. It was seen as illegal and vindictive by
the teachers. |
.
| It
is difficult to see education as an essential service as lives are not
in immediate danger for lack of a teacher, and the service, unlike police,
fire and ambulance, is not a 24 hour life and death service. |
. |