..
|
Do
immigrants assimilate faster where there is a policy of "Melting Pot" than
a policy of "Mosaic?"
|
.
| The
question about whether the policies of two host countries, melting pot
or mosaic, have any effect on rates of assimilation, uses Canada and the
USA for comparison. |
.
| Usually
assimilation of migrants takes a similar pattern through generations, although
the rate or speed of change may vary. |
.
| The
incoming or migrating generation struggles to survive in the new environment
(especially if there is a difference in language), and retains many of
the values and behaviour patterns of their society of origin. |
.
| The
second generation, being socialised at school as much as at home, tends
to rebel against the home culture, and often over identifies with the host
culture. |
.
| This
may continue into the third generation, or may be the beginning of a new
set of values, which tends to romanticise the culture of origin and adapt
values and behaviour which reflect that romanticisation more than the real
culture of the original society. |
.
| That
variation in rate appears to be more a function of the nature of the host
culture, brought by the migrants, than the policies of the host culture. |
.
| This
is the conclusion of Stanford Lyman who studied the issue. |
.
| Be
aware that "melting pot" does not mean all immigrants unilaterally
convert to some monolithic mainstream American society. |
.
| When
you mix the colours yellow and red, you get neither yellow nor red, but
orange. |
.
| A
melting pot policy expected that mainstream American society itself would
also change as a result of the melting of so many different cultures. |
.
| Also,
a "mosaic" policy did not mean the total keeping of everything cultural
from societies of origin. |
.
| It
meant also immigrants needed to learn how to live and operate in the mainstream
culture, and that meant learning one of the mainstream languages, and also
to live according to the laws and customs of the host country when those
varied from the laws and customs of the societies of origin. |
.
| What
has this got to do with variations in family life? |
.
| We
cannot say that families are the same or different in the USA and Canada,
because in both places there is no monolithic or orthodox family. |
.
| There
is a range of family composition and dynamics in both the USA and Canada. |
.
| The
nuclear family as an ideal, with women working at home and men working
outside the home, is promoted by religious conservatives (of various
theologies) in both places. |
.
| Variations,
including same sex partners, single parents, common law marriage, and others,
appear in both places. |
.
| Variations
tend to be in rates or degrees (and are minor) rather than qualitative
variations. |
.
| Families
of new immigrants tend to be similar to what they were in their societies
of origin, with variations from that in later generations, or after some
time has passed in first generations. |
. |