..
| Prediction
is the main way of testing the validity of a theory in science. |
.
| Much
prediction is backwards prediction (in time) for social sciences, because
the events may have already occurred, but we look at other variables to
see if they appear to have some influence on the variables we examine and
want to predict. |
.
| When
there are many variables which jointly act on the behaviour of something,
it is impossible for us to differentiate (don’t you just love that big
word?) between them. |
.
| This
is not only true for the social sciences, but even for physics. |
.
| We
may know all the relationships of force that can affect a single leaf
––
gravity, wind, location –– yet not be
able to predict the exact path that a leaf will take when it falls of a
tree and moves toward the earth. |
.
| We
are a little better at statistics and predicting that when many leaves
fall, they will form a bell curve in a ring around the tree ––
so long as the wind is calm. |
.
| Our
concept of "causality" is fraught with problems. |
.
| It
is a bugbear to all scientists, including social scientists. |
.
| We
can examine data from two variables and see that they vary in association
with each other, but there is no logic or observation that will confirm
that one causes the other. |
.
| When
we say a change in variable "a" causes a change in variable "b," we mean
that a change in "a" is sufficient and necessary to change the variable
"b." |
.
.
| Also
see key word: Cause. |
. |