This Page Obsolete!
UPDATE - The 2003 Federal Telemarketing Regulation (US) has responded to this issue by holding the client business primarily liable for the actions of the telemarketers they hire -- the Feds' way of saying, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
The FTC's holding the client liable has probably had more effect on telemarketers than the "Do Not Call" List. It seems the telescum's clients don't trust them! (e.g., Primus Telecommunications reported to shareholders that it anticipated in excess of a $1 Million fines because an outside telemarketing company placed calls on behalf of their US subsidiary to marks who asked the company to leave them alone. Reuters, 14-Jan-04)
The following was posted, beginning in 1997. I left it
here because of its historical significance in pointing out the
"hidden identity" problem.
Meanwhile several states have specific
requirements for telemarketer identity.
(I know... legal compliance by telemarketing scum is an oximoron. But perhaps there are a few people in that business who care about the law?)
Always ask "who are you working for?": followed by "who is your employer?" When you still get bullschidt answers (you will), immediately ask to speak with a supervisor.
You should always know with whom you are doing business. The scum are working for a telemarketing company which is legally an agent. Same as a realtor or insurance agent (except someone is calling you)
Explain that you fully expect honesty from anyone you do
business with. "Who is your employer?" is totally
unambiguous in its meaning. You know the identity of a realtor
and a broker, and expect at least the same of a 'business' who
approaches you.
The FTC and FCC (US) in their promulgation of the 2003 Federal Telemarketing Regulation took the telescum industry's "suggestion" and made the business who engaged the telemarketing operation directly responsible for the telemarketing operation. Apparently the FTC determined that telescum can't be presumed responsible, and so they made the business ultimately responsible for the contractors who do their bidding!
So as a result, it may not matter if the telescum hide behind their client. The client gets to pay the penalty anyway.
File a complaint under the telecommunications act against both the identified company and their telemarketing company. Telemarketing is performed under a contract and these contracts usually specify how the caller identify his/her... I mean itself.
The FTC (US) now has penalties for assisting telemarketers in violation of the law. Examples of "assisting" include participation in writing the script. This is important because:
Specify if the telemarketer claims to have agreed to conceal its identity. If that is the case, the complaint should be against both the business whose products are being sold and the clandestine telemarketing agent (not to be confused with a 'secret agent'!)
In order to make a good job of it, try to identify:
Use a Form to keep records of such requests
It may be necessary to move on to a "verifier,"
typically used by telephone long distance carriers because of
prior history of slamming in the
industry. Ask the verifier the name of the sleezeball company.
(If they don't give the name, get the name of the verifier
company.)
Tell people that they should always get the identity of
the company doing the calling. This is a matter of basic
consumer awareness.
Most states require the operator's identity and some specify that to be the full legal name. The following require the identity of the business operation.
These states require location data but not identity of the telemarketing business:
site first posted 3-nov-96
this page 1997. Revised 9-Oct-07 copyright 1996, 1997, 2004 Stan Protigal