(Disclaimer: I'm a Christian, so I was hardly able to give this an
unbiased reading.)
For a number of years now I've had it in my mind to read the Quran, the
holy book of Islam. That desire became more of a priority since September
11th and finally at the last Friends of the Library book sale, I searched
out and bought my own copy. It's not an "official" copy. Dawood is a
scholar who wants to leave the questions "of Mohammed's prophethood and
his theological sources" to the reader to decide for him or herself. He
even has rearranged the surahs from their classic organization to
one that is more thematic. (But he does provide the traditional
numbering, so I was able to read the book in the traditional order.) But
like some of the untraditional translations or paraphrases of the Bible,
I think that the main message can still come through. First off, I was
slightly surprised that the book wasn't as lame or unreadable as it
might have been. There are some beautiful expressions of faith in God,
even though they're tarnished by an incomplete understanding of Him. I
can see why this book has stood the test of time. Where it fell
short--the reason it didn't make me interested in becoming a Muslim--is
that there's a subtle focus on Mohammed. Over and over again The
Koran reiterates that Allah can and will raise the dead, that those
who had scoffed at previous prophets suffered for it, that Allah has no
daughters, that those who deny the Quran's message will suffer in hell.
These are things that all tie in with Mohammed's problems as he tried to
bring his message to the people of Mecca and Medina. In contrast, the
Bible talks about people of various stations and in various situations
relating to God and each other. We see Moses as an infant, a sinner, a
priest and an administrator as well as the prophet who confronted
Pharaoh. In The Koran, you only see the latter. Like the Book
of Mormon, I found The Koran to be rather lackluster in
comparison to the Bible. Unlike the New Testament, I found no continuity
between the Old Testament and The Koran. If this is a new
revelation from Allah, why doesn't it fit together as well? Anyway, I
would recommend that you check it out, if
you're so inclined. But you'd be much better off reading the Bible.
go back to top ↑
Cloak by S. D. Perry
Read in November of 2002
More Star Trek brain candy. The tale starts out with Captain
Kirk's Enterprise stopping a runaway Federation starship. All
aboard are dead and as the crew delves into the mystery they find a
rather Byzantine plot. This is not a great book--definitely waiting room material--but it was enjoyable
enough, and the author makes a good point about the shortcomings of
blind obedience to one's doctrines.
go back to top ↑
Flatland by Edwin A. Abbott
Read in November of 2002
(Despite what my daughter says, this is not a book about Illinois.) This
is an odd little book--kind of like a geometric fairy tale. The narrator
of this tale is A Square. He tells of his world, a universe of two
dimensions. It's inhabitants are all polygons and in the first section,
Mr. Square describes the society in which these creatures live. In the
second section, he then describes his encounters with other dimensions:
Lineland, Pointland and Spaceland. It's not a terribly complex book--I
happened to have read a book called The Planiverse which offered
a two dimensional world with much more scientific detail--but
Flatland has a definite style and essence to its tale which makes
it memorable. That's probably why this book from 1884 (second edition)
was reprinted 68 years later in 1952 and why it's going
on my shelf 118 years later in 2002.
go back to top ↑
Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman
Read in November of 2002
Kill your television before it kills you. Actually, that's not really the
message of the book. As far as our culture is concerned, TV is already
guilty of murder. Mr. Postman shows how television (on the heels of other
electronic media) has shaped public discussion in our once literary
culture. He argues persuasively that the medium affects the content of
what one tries to communicate. Television, which all but demands a moving
picture to accompany its words, drives the level of content in the
message down. As a result, we don't have the same depth of discussion in
our communities--be it politics, religion or education--that we had back
in the 18th and 19th centuries. (If you doubt me, go ahead and try to
read the stuff they wrote back then.) In a sense, it's a scary book. It
offers no real hope of change. And since it was written in 1985, I know
that things have not gotten better. But life goes on. Ours is not the
only culture in the world, nor, hopefully, the last generation. Maybe God
is not done blessing humanity with great thinkers, teachers, statesmen
and artists. And if not, one can still light a candle in the darkness.
You can always grab the library card instead of the remote and encourage
others to do the same. So I encourage you to check
it out.
go back to top ↑
The Purpose Driven Church by Rick Warren
Read in November of 2002
I didn't want to read a church growth book. I was looking to attend a
seminar for small churches. I was kind of hoping that they would offer
ideas for congregations to function as small churches rather than
operating with the constant desire to be big someday. But I let inertia
drag me to the seminar even after I found out that it was church growth
and this book came with the package. I was surprised. Dr. Warren is not
a shallow, suburban airhead. In 1979, he felt called by God to plant a
church. He was led to the Saddleback Valley in Lake Forest, California
and started reaching out to the unchurched people living there. The boy
done good. The church has grown to about 18,000 (as of 1995) and
intentionally pushes its members to be strong and faithful servants for
Jesus Christ. In The Purpose Driven Church, Dr. Warren explains
the principles by which he founded, has grown and operates his
congregation. Like I said, I was surprised when I read the book. As I
went through it I realized that Dr. Warren has some very good points,
based more on scripture than on marketing principles. I was uncomfortable
when he pointed out problems that I recognized in my own church (and
self). I was also convicted when I realized that I'm prejudiced against
upper-middle class, suburban Americans--the very people to whom Dr.
Warren and his church ministers. But despite the discomfort, I was able
to read the book and might have even learned from it. Now, the book is
not perfect. Dr. Warren naturally pulls examples from his own
congregation, and that left me curious how the principles would play out
with a different social class or ethnic group. I was also annoyed at the
lack of references. Dr. Warren mentions enough outside sources that he
comes across as well read in theology and church history--at least until
he says, "Remember, they burned Wycliffe at the stake ..." According to
the books on my shelf, John Wycliffe died a natural death. It makes me
wonder whether his other references are legit, but as the only books he
mentions by title are the Bible and some of his other works, I can't
easily check it out. Anyway, if you hold any sort of leadership position
in a Christian church, check this out.
Errors aside, it should give you something to ponder. If not, perhaps
you need to be writing your own book.
go back to top ↑
A Wrinkle in Time by Madeline L'Engle
Read in November of 2002
This one's about an adventure experienced by Meg Murry, a teenage girl
whose father is missing. He was a scientist off working on a government
project and, about two years before the tale begins, he suddenly stopped
writing home. As the story progresses, Meg, her brother, Charles
Wallace, and one of her schoolmates, Calvin O'Keefe, encounter three odd
women who end up transporting them to a distant world to try and rescue
Meg's father, who is apparently a victim of an experiment gone awry. It's
a tale with a Christian worldview, with a definite conflict between good
and evil. However, it came off as a pale imitation of C. S. Lewis. It
took me a while to figure out what's lacking--and that was a lack of
God. In Lewis' Narnia series, God, in the person of Aslan, is a
main player. He often starts and finishes the tale and helps the
protaganists along. In Wrinkle, God's nowhere to be seen. The
heroes have some supernatural help, but essentially are left to rely on
their own strengths. It's a subtle difference, but quite noticable. I
was not as impressed with this tale as was Gene Veith, but I would still
recommend it as good waiting room material.
go back to top ↑
Heaven on Earth by Robert Tobias
Read in November of 2002
This is a little piece of propaganda sent out in the mid-1990's to
congregations
of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and some Orthodox Church
here in the Americas. (The book isn't clear on that and I'm not familiar
with the organization of that church body.) It's a collection of
anecdotes and spiritual reflections meant to accompany the official
reports of dialogues held between the ELCA and the Orthodox church. I
picked it up from the Library sale because I have a slight curiosity
about the Orthodox church and I figured that a book that contrasts their
church and a Lutheran one would be enlightening. It was, to an extent.
It didn't give me a handle on the doctrine or practice so I could go out
and explain the Orthodox beliefs to anyone. The benefit I received from
this book was more in reminding me that my own worldviews are not
universal and that sometimes there is another, equally valid way of
looking at some aspect of life on this earth. Nothing earth-shattering,
but definitely makes great waiting room
material.
go back to top ↑
Casca: Panzer Soldier by Barry Sadler
Read in November of 2002
I've written about the Casca series before. In fact, I've even
gotten e-mail messages from a Casca fan who's read my reviews. (It
was very scary to discover that people actually read these things.)
Anyway, The series is about this Roman soldier, Casca Rufio Longinus,
who was one of the soldiers at Christ's crucifixion and was cursed by
Jesus to wander the earth as a soldier until He returns. The theology is
a bit lame, but I was really intrigued by the idea back in the 80s and
bought a number of the books in the series. Of those, I remember
Panzer Soldier as being the best. Well, I've just reread this one
and now wonder "what was I thinking?" This time I found the book
disappointing. It seemed unrealistic. Why I didn't catch it before, I
don't know. Maybe it was because I'm more sensitive to the bad theology
I mentioned above. Maybe I'm just more mature and can't swallow the
Russians as the two dimensional bad guys they are protrayed as in the
book. Maybe the old married man can't believe the male-female
relationships the way the ignorant young punk once did. Maybe, with the
drums of war sounding on the news every day, I can no longer relax and
enjoy a tale of men slaughtering each other. God only knows. Anyway, the
book is not totally worthless. As always, the character Casca has
a streak of nobility in him. It's also a bit inventive to have the hero
serve with the World War II German army. In this genre you would have
expected him to have served with the Brits or the Yanks. (Of course he
did soundly denounce Hitler and the SS.) Finally, in this book
Sadler downplayed Casca's immortality, focusing more on the realistic
action. So, for those few good points, I'll keep this one dry and rate
it as waiting room material.
go back to top ↑
Daniel: Encouragement for Faith by Paul E.
Deterding
Read in December of 2002
When I started planning for this Fall's session of the Thursday morning
Bible class, I polled the class for what they wanted to study. The
consensus was for something from the Old Testament and the one definite
preference voiced asked to study either Ezekiel or Daniel. Well, I'll
spare you my feelings of ambivalence over apocalyptic books, but I will
tell you that I ran to get a study put out by my own denomination. I
wanted to get the party line regarding the interpretations of the
various prophecies and cryptic references before I started wading
through the various theories that have been proposed over the centuries.
Anyway, this Bible study booklet is very conservative and down to earth.
Actually, I was quite disappointed at first, as I went through the
narrative tales that make up the first half of Daniel. I found the study
to be very lacking. (Especially since I was reading Longman's Daniel (below) at the same time.) It made up
for it in chapter seven, when the Bible starts recounting visions and
prophecies. Deterding brought in enough historical data to let me
understand what was being predicted and helped me to pull some meaning
from it all. Given it's theological stance, I'll have to give it a
biased check it out.
go back to top ↑
Pilgrim's Progress by John Bunyan
Read in December of 2002
Pilgrim's Progress is a classic allegory of the Christian's
journey through this life. It tells the tale of a man, subtly named
"Christian", and his attempt to escape his city, named "Destruction", and
make his way to the Celestial City. As a Christian myself, I found it to
be a great story. It got a bit pietistic at times, but Bunyan was a
Puritan, so such a flavor should be expected. I'm still debating whether
to buy myself a copy or not, but I can definitely tell you to check it out.
go back to top ↑
Daniel: The NIV Application Commentary by
Tremper Longman III
Read in December of 2002
This was the commentary I bought to assist in my preparation to lead the
Thursday morning Bible class in studying the book of Daniel. Harvest Logos had a few
references from which to choose, and even though it was a hardcover and
cost more, I went with this one. It's part of the NIV Application
Commentary series, which attempts to show the meaning the Bible has for
contemporary American life. The format focuses first on the original
meaning of the text, or how it would be understood by its original
audience. Then it focuses on bridging the ancient and modern contexts,
eventually wrapping up with the contemporary significance of the
chapter. In the case of Daniel, it seemed somewhat easy. The main
message is simple: God is in control. That was shown both in the stories
of the first half and the cryptic prophecies of the second. Anyway,
there's more to be gleaned from the book from that main point, and
Longman does it quite well, in my opinion. He holds a theologically
conservative view of the work, but also mentions the other prevailing
arguments. And he's even honest enough to admit when the other side has
a good case for their view. In a sense, it's everything I would want
from a commentary: background information for understanding and insight
as to how I might adapt it to my life. This one's staying on my shelf.
go back to top ↑
HTML 4 for Dummies by Ed Tittel and
Stephen Nelson James
Read in December of 2002
This here's the HTML reference book I picked up at the Friends of the
Library sale. I'd much rather have Elizabeth Castro's HTML 4 for the World Wide
Web but I didn't see a copy of that one for 75¢. This one's
all right, I guess. I'm not real crazy about the "for Dummies" series.
I've read a few and wasn't impressed by their style. (Of course, now
that I think about it, all the other "Dummies" books I read were about
PCs.) This one fits right in. Anyway, compared to Castro's book, this is
less a tutorial than an introduction to HTML. Rather than showing you
how to craft a web page they give you a list of commands and expect you
to go to town with them. Well, they also include a CD-ROM that supposedly
contains many examples. My copy, however, is a used book from the
Seattle Public Library, and the CD no longer works on my Mac. Oh, well,
at least I got my 75¢ worth. It is a useful reference book
and will do unless I find something better. I would rate it as waiting room material.
go back to top ↑
Socrates Meets Jesus by Peter Kreeft
Read in December of 2002
Back when I reviewed Three
Philosophies of Life, I said I would have to read more of Peter
Kreeft's work. Well, I finally got around to that. (Not my fault that the
library doesn't carry much of his stuff.) I had read Plato's account of
the trial of Socrates in Philosophy and Contemporary Issues and
immediately recalled this title. When I was up at Harvest Logos looking for an
Ezekiel bible study, I peeked to see if this was on the shelf and when I
found it I succumbed to temptation and impulsively bought it. Anyway,
this is written in play format and has Socrates, the father of Western
philosophy, appearing at "Have It University" in Boston. He finds
himself enrolled in courses in the divinity school there and spends the
rest of the book questioning and challenging his fellow students and a
couple of his teachers. All in all, it came across as a thinly veiled
course in apologetics. A fairly one sided course, at that. Socrates
opponents are all caught off guard and in the end, Socrates "meets
Jesus" and becomes convinced of Christianity's truthfulness. I would
imagine that the real apostate and heterodox Christians would be a bit
harder to confound. Be that as it may, I'm keeping the book. The drama
may be weak, but Kreeft is a wonderful writer and has this real poetic
way of describing God's relationship with his people. I really was moved
by Socrates' wonder at the reality of God taking on human form, which in
turn colored my own thoughts as I worshipped this Christmas. So why I
have to be honest about the book's flaws, I do recommend that you check it out despite them.
go back to top ↑
Microcosmic Tales selected by Isaac
Asimov, Martin H. Greenberg and Joseph D. Olander
Read in January of 2003
This is the ultimate waiting room material--a book that carried me
through the tedious moments of jury duty. It's a collection of
short-short science fiction stories. 100 tales, each of which fills but
a handful of pages. Many of them are humorous, some horrific. Plenty of
them have been written by the great authors of science fiction. I'm
tempted to say that all of the stories are good, because I can't
remember a single klunker in the lot. Anyway, I'm keeping this gem on my shelf.
go back to top ↑
Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich
Read in February of 2003
Between this book and the January-February issue of Atlantic
Monthly, I'm not feeling too good about myself these days. You see, I
have a prejudice against the wealthy and for the working class. It's a
dumb prejudice, like most. Anyway, as I was reading these works (and
working on my income tax forms) I could not escape the fact that I am
nowhere near living in poverty. But enough of my shortcomings. This is a
very good book--well written in an amusing and engaging style. In order
to test the American belief that hard work will lead to success, and to
get a first hand report on how well one can survive on minimum wage, Ms.
Ehrenreich left her home and attempted to live as an "unskilled" worker.
On three different occasions she went out, got some entry level jobs and
tried to make ends meet. If she managed to save enough for the next
month's rent, she would consider herself "successful." The results
weren't a total surprise. I won't spoil anything by mentioning
specifics, but I think most people are aware that minimum wage is not
enough to escape poverty. But the book was good in that it put a human
face on the statistics and perhaps even reveals some aspects of the
reality of the working poor of which us rich folk aren't aware. I know
that I will definitely be tipping better in the days to come and
hopefully will be reminded to show more respect to those who serve me in
the stores and restaurants I frequent. Anyway, I advise you all to check it out.
go back to top ↑
Mac OS X Unleashed by John and William C. Ray
Read in February of 2003
I pride myself on being able to figure things out, but sometimes I need a
leeetle bit of help. This is happening once again as my company is making
the transition to the latest Macintosh operating system, OS X. I've heard
that there are a number of changes to the system and that it's not quite
as idiot proof as the previous Mac systems. (My first attempt to play
with OS X resulted in a frantic hour late one Saturday night. 'Twas a
problem that was due, I believe, to moving a few files out of the
appropriate folder.) So I made a rare financial investment in my
(snicker!) career and bought this book. It does a nice enough job
explaining the new system and pointing out major differences between it
and its predecessors. It also gives a good explanation of OS X's origins
and the rationale behind some of the changes. (So now I'll stop cussing
everytime I have to log in just to use the estupido computer) From
there, however, it goes on to detail the possibilities offered by the
UNIX system 'pon which OS X rests. It was a bit interesting. However, I
don't see myself using much of it, even if I should somehow be granted
administrative access to the system. I guess I'm not the tech head I
used to be. Anyway, even though I sometimes wish I had bought Robin
William's OS X book instead, I would definitely
recommend that anyone running a modern Macintosh check this book out.
go back to top ↑
J. P. Patches: Northwest Icon by Julius
Pierpont Patches and Bryan Johnston
Read in March of 2003
I live in Seattle, but I'm not crazy about it. I'd much rather be living
in Chicago, the area wherein I was born and raised. There are a few things in
the area, however, which I must concede surpass anything similar in the
Windy City. One of those is the legacy of J. P. Patches, a kid's show
which ran in Seattle from 1958 to 1981. The people who were kids out here
during that era are nuts about it. My wife, a Northwest native, would
rave about him. In the past few years I've been able to see J. P. in
person, as well as on some of the few tapes that exist of the show. The
adulation he receives is well deserved--this man is funny. Funnier than
Bozo, Garfield Goose or Ray Rayner, even. (All the Chicago kids now
think I'm a traitor and hate my guts.) Anyway, now there's a book about
him, which gives a behind the scenes look at the show. It was a very
entertaining read, reminiscent of some of the Marx Bros. biographies I've
read. J.P. came on the scene when TV was young. Those pioneers
of the medium were worked to death... and seemed to have a hell of a lot
of fun in the process. Once again, I was wish I had talent and was born
in a different era. Oh, well. I don't know if someone who doesn't know
J. P. will enjoy this book like I did, but you should still risk checking it out. Or just go to www.jppatches.com and get a taste
of what you're missing.
go back to top ↑
A Romance of the Equator by Brian Aldiss
Read in March of 2003
This one is a book I won in a contest given by T5 at Mysan's
Corner. (His own site is the T5 Universe, but I digress.) Subtitled "Best Fantasy
Stories", it's collection of short stories written between 1960 and
1989. Like one might expect from such a collection, the stories range in
characters, location and style. If one tale doesn't strike your fancy,
the next one will be quite different and perhaps more to your liking. I
found the book to be a very interesting read. Mr. Aldiss is a very poetic
writer--sometimes alluding to what's happening rather than spelling it
out for you. This is more pronounced in the stories from the late
sixties and early seventies, some of which I found to be downright
confusing. But even those had an element of mood that touched me. Like I
said, poetic. I'd be hard pressed to pick a single favorite. I enjoyed
"A Romance of the Equator" for the way it describes love and its ending.
In "Th e Blue Background" and "So Far from Prague", it was the way Aldiss
described the setting and situations which caught my interest.
"Consolations of Age" offered a good laugh. So, like any book that falls
into my hands, I have to determine whether this one is worth keeping. I
can't help but feel that these stories will be even better the next time
around, so I'm putting this one on my shelf.
go back to top ↑
The Robin Williams Mac OS X Book by
Robin Williams
Read in March of 2003
(If you've been into Macintosh computing for any length of time, you
probably know that the author of this book is not the
actor/comedian Robin Williams. Now the rest of you know, too.)
As I mentioned above, I needed to read up on the latest Macintosh
operating system. Though I had purchased Mac OS X
Unleashed, I was also tempted to pick up this tome. When I
happened to see this book at the library, I checked it out to see what I
had missed. Like I had determined at the book store, Ms. Williams' book
is geared towards the neophyte. In addition to explaining how to use the
operating system, she also discusses such basics as to how to use the
mouse and keyboard. It definitely was not the book for which I was
looking. But having said that, I also must confess that this is a great book.
Ms. Williams is very informative and does it with quite an engaging style.
Things are explained very clearly and simply. (Even my ten year old
daughter has picked up the book and enjoyed it. But then, my ten year old
is weird.) It has far more illustrations than Mac OS X Unleashed, which is quite useful.
Of course, it also contains only about half as much information. She
doesn't even touch on the Unix system beneath OS X. But it does tell you what
you need to know about the system. Unless you really want to "get under
the hood" and really master your new Mac, this book is a great resource.
In fact, even if you do want a tome at the expert level, you might want
to check this out first to get a primer on
the basics.
go back to top ↑
| ← previously read | Back to J's index. | more recently read → |