EXHIBIT D: TESTIMONY OF MRS. S.F. ANDERICK

(with investigative questions by Wade Englund)


Statement:

"I was born in New York State near the Massachusetts line, May 7, 1809. In 1812 my parents moved to a farm two miles from the village, and in the township of Palmyra, New York. In 1823 mother died, and I went to her sister's, Mrs. Earl Wilcox, where I lived much of the time until December, 1828, when I went to live with father who had again married and settled on a farm on the Holland Patent, twenty miles west of Rochester, New York. Uncle Earl's farm was four miles south of Palmyra village, and his house was nearly opposite old Jo Smith's, father of the Mormon prophet. Old Jo was dissipated. He and his son Hyrum worked some at coopering. Hyrum was the only son sufficiently educated to teach school. I attended when he taught in the log school house east of uncle's. He also taught in the Stafford District. He and Sophronia were the most respected of the family, who were not much thought of in the commu-nity. They cleared the timber from only a small part of their farm, and never paid for the land. They tried to live without work. I have often heard the neighbors say they did not know how the Smiths lived, they earned so little money. The farmers who lived near the Smiths had many sheep and much poultry stolen. They often sent officers to search the premises of the Smiths for stolen property, who usually found the house locked. It was said the creek near the house of the Smiths was lined with the feet and heads of sheep. Uncle's chil-dren were all sons, and they played with Smith's young-er children, I associated much with Sophronia Smith, the oldest daughter, as she was the only girl my age who lived in our vicinity. I often accompanied her, Hyrum, and young Jo Smith, who became the Mormon proph-et, to apple parings and parties. Jo was pompous, pretentious, and active at parties. He claimed, when a young man, he could tell where lost or hidden things and treasures were buried or located with a forked witch hazel. He deceived many farmers, induced them to dig nights for chests of gold, when the pick struck the chest, someone usually spoke, and Jo would say the enchantment was broken, and the chest would leave.

"Williard [sic] Chase, a Methodist who lived about two miles from uncle's, while digging a well, found a gray smooth stone about the size and shape of an egg. Sal-lie, Williard's sister, also a Methodist, told me several times that young Jo Smith, who became the Mormon prophet, often came to her to inquire where to dig for treasures. She told me she would place the stone in a hat and hold it to her face, and claimed things would be brought to her view. Sallie let me have it several times, but I never could see anything in or through it. I heard that Jo obtained it and called it a peep-stone, which he used in place of the witch hazel. Uncle refused to let Jo dig on his farm. I have seen many holes where he dug on other farms.

"When Jo joined the Presbyterian Church, in Palmyra village, it caused much talk and surprise, as he claimed to receive revelations from the Lord. He also claimed he found some gold plates with characters on them, in a hill between uncle's and father's, which I often crossed. Several times I saw what he claimed were the plates, which were covered with a cloth. They appeared to be six or eight inches square. He frequently car-ried them with him. I heard they kept them under the brick hearth.

"He was from home much summers. Sometimes he said he had been to Broome County, New York, and Pennsylvania. Several times while I was visiting Sophronia Smith at old Jo's house, she told me that a stranger who I saw there several times in warm weather and several months apart, was Mr. Rigdon. At other times the Smith chil-dren told me that Mr. Rigdon was at their house when I did not see him. I did not read much in the 'Book of Mormon' because I had no confidence in Jo. Palmyra people claimed that Jo did not know enough to be the author of the 'Book of Mormon,' and believed that Rigdon was its author. I was acquainted with most of the people about us, and with Martin Harris.

"On my way to California I stopped in Salt Lake City from July, 1852, until March, 1853. I received much attention from Mormon ladies because I was acquainted, and had danced with their prophet. Mrs. S.F. Anderick. "Witnessed by: Mrs. L.A. Rogers (daughter), Oscar G. Rogers (grandson).
"Subscribed and sworn before F.S. Baker, Notary Public for Monterey County, California, June 24, 1887. F.S. Baker

"Dear Sir: Mrs. S.F. Anderick, of whom you inquire, is a member of my church. She is a most estimable Chris-tian woman, and is possessed of more than average intellectual ability and culture. She is careful in her speech and reliable in judgment; sound in mind and of unimpeachable veracity. Her testimony would be first-class in any court of justice upon any subject with which she might be conversant. Respectfully, G.W. Izer, Pastor Simpson Memorial Methodist Episcopal Church, San Francisco, Cal."


"Dear Sir: I am personally acquainted with Mrs. S.F. Anderick, and have been for two years. She lives on this street, one block from my residence. I have often met her in church, in society and in her home. I am certain that she is remarkably well preserved, and is sound in mind. She is a woman of intelligence, and of high moral and Christian character. Always sincerely, C.H. Fowler Bishop of the M.E. Church"(34)

Investigative Questions

  1. How reliable can Mrs. Anderick's statement be about a trivial event (i.e. allegedly being told the name of a stranger who supposedly visited the Smith's on several occasion during her youth), that she records for the first time (at least that is known) approximately 60 years after the alleged events, and at the age of 78?
  2. Why is there no record of her testimony prior to that point? Did she make mention of Rigdon's alleged visit during her nine-month stay in Salt Lake City, when she "received much attention from Mormon ladies"?
  3. What (or who) prompted her to finally make a statement after so many years? Could it have been the advertisement by A. B. Deming (the source for this statement), in which there was offered payment in exchange for testimony about Rigdon being at Palmyra prior to 1830? (see **Deming Ad below)
  4. She mentions her Uncle Wilcox's son's, who also played with the Smith children, are there similar statement from any of them regarding Rigdon?
  5. She claims that Sophronia Smith, and other Smith children, told her about Rigdon. Are there any statements from these people to confirm or deny what Mrs. Anderick claims of them?
  6. Why was there felt the need to make, not one, but two, statements vouching for Mrs. Anderick's judgement and sound mind. Could it be that the party soliciting Mrs. Anderick's statement recognized the inherent questionable or untimely nature of her statement, and attempted to sure it up? And, aren't the vouching statement irrelevant in determining the accuracy of Anderick's statement, since those doing the vouching were not personally privy to the alleged events, and thus could neither confirm nor deny that they occurred?
  7. Isn't the vast majority of Mrs. Anderick's whole statement merely a repeat of rumors and conjectures (by my count, there were at least twelve alleged events that she did not, or could not, have had direct knowledge, many of which she acknowledged by say such things as, "I have often heard," "it was said," "she told me", "Palmyra people claimed. . .", etc.)? Aren't some of these rumors stated as though they are fact--though she cannot confirm that they were? And, is it possible that her memory of the alleged visits of Rigdon were actually derived from rumors she had heard over the 60 years, and came to believe in her mind that they occurred just as much as some of the other events that she did not, nor could not, have had direct knowledge? Or, is it possible that she did see a stranger, who was not Rigdon, but her memory of the Rigdon name may have been derived from rumors told over the 60 years?
  8. Doesn't the nature of her statement lend itself to the assumption above: contrary to other parts of her whole statement, the Rigdon part lacks specificity on certain details (we don't know the year, or the months, or the reasons for the alleged visits, what Rigdon was supposedly doing, where or how Mrs. Anderick happened to allegedly see him, how he looked, what he was wearing, what interest Anderick may have had in him that would cause her to remember such a seemingly trivial event, etc.), and other parts of the Rigdon story were quite specific (the alleged visits were "several months apart," and Rigdon's first and last name), the use of the term "stranger" common to most all of the statements of the alleged eyewitness that you, the authors of the Enigma, have put forward, and the unusual part about her supposedly being told by the Smith children of Rigdon's alleged visits when supposedly she was not there to see him.
  9. Doesn't the vagueness of her 60-year-old Rigdon statement make it impossible to test its accuracy against empirical data such as what may exist in the Rigdon time-line? Yet the Enigma authors went on to knowingly and falsely claim that "for in every instance without exception, where a witness or witnesses have claimed that Rigdon and Smith were together, a gap in Rigdon's chronology occurs which allows sufficient time for him to have visited New York." As the author's have also said, "every liar slips up somewhere" (see Enigma p. 490), and it appears that both Anderick and the Enigma authors slipped up here.

**cite Deming Ad:


Back

Last updated 2/4/01