The Spalding Enigma:
The Fallacy of Repetition Continued?
A Critique In Progress by Wade Englund
Table of Contents:
Introduction:
Articles:
- Fatal error #1: The Conneaut and Other Witnesses: Selective, Tampered, Confabulated, Conflicting, Contrary, and Absurd Evidence. Issues: #1 Not "Same", #2 No "Smoking Gun", #3 Selective, #4 Tampering/Leading, #5 Prompted, #6 More Tampering. (Completed)
- Fatal error #1: The Conneaut and Other Witnesses: Selective, Tampered, Confabulated, Conflicting, Contrary, and Absurd Evidence. -Continued-. Issues: #7 Conflicts/Irregularities, #8 Unlike BoM, #9 Absurdities, #10 Extrapolations, #11 Vague, Summary.
(Partially complete and
currently in progress)
- Fatal error #2: Rigdon Did Not Visit Smith Prior to 1830!. (Mostly complete and currently in progress)
- Fatal error #3: The Manuscript Lost is the Manuscript
Found. (Under construction)
- Fatal error #4: The Similarities are Relatively Meaningless. (Under construction)
- Fatal error #5: The Unwitting absurdities. (Under construction)
- The Amazing Evolution of the Farcical Spalding
Theory (the Howe/Hurlbut period) (forthcoming)
- The Amazing Evolution of the Farcical Spalding
Theory (the Braden period) (forthcoming)
- The Amazing Evolution of the Farcical Spalding
Theory (the Schroeder period) (forthcoming)
- The Amazing Evolution of the Farcical Spalding
Theory (today) (forthcoming)
Last updated 7/22/01