EXHIBIT E: TESTIMONY OF W. A. Lillie
(with investigative questions by Wade
Englund)
Statement:
"I was born in Trumbull Co., Ohio, in 1815. Our family moved to Chester,
the town adjoining Kirtland on the south, in 1822. About 1834 Mr. Pearne, of
Chester, told me he used to live in the neighborhood of the Mormon Smith family
in Palmyra, N.Y., and was well acquainted with all of them. He said they were a
low family and of no account in the community. He told me the summer before Jo
Smith, the Mormon prophet, first came to Ohio, he often saw Smith and Rigdon
together. It was the first he knew of Rigdon, and it was before the 'Book of
Mormon' was published. He saw Smith and Rigdon start together in a buggy for
Ohio. Mr. Pearne knew Rigdon well after coming to Ohio and said he believed he
was at the bottom of Mormonism. My father borrowed the 'Book of Mormon' and
when he had finished reading it laughed and remarked Rigdon had done pretty
well. W.A. Lillie, Witnessed by: A.B. Deming, Thomas B. Page. 'Sworn to and
subscribed in my presence at Willoughby, Lake County, Ohio, this 7th day of
March 1885. A.P. Barber, Justice of the Peace' (35) "
Investigative questions:
(note: fatal questions are marked with an asterisk *)
- How reliable can a hearsay statement be that is made 51 years after an
alleged conversation, which was about an insignificant event that had supposedly
occured 3 years prior to the alleged conversation (being told by an acquaintence
about supposedly seeing Rigdon in Palmyra during the summer of 1830)?
- What are the odds that you or I, after 51 years, would recall (correctly or
otherwise) a somewhat meaningless comment made by an acquaintence about a
relative stranger who was supposedly seen three years prior to the conversation?
- How reliable can a hearsay statement be that, after 51 year, was presumably
given in reponse to a newspaper as by A. B. Deming (one of the two witnesses to
Lillie's statement), in which he offered money in exchange for testimony, abd
who, along with other Spalding theorists at the time, was vigorously trying to
find evidence for Rigdon's alleged visits with Smith prior to the winter of
1830?
- Even assuming that Lillie remembered the conversation correctly after all
those years, does that necessarily mean that he heard "Pearne"
correctly on all points, or that "Pearne" was correct in what he said
on all points?
- *How reliable can a hearsay statement be that is anachronistic? According
to what "Pearne" had allegedly told Lillie, Joseph Smith left for Ohio
"befor the 'Book of Mormon' was published." Whereas, it is undisputed
that the Book of Mormon was published in the spring of 1830, and Joseph Smith
left for Ohio in January of 1831, clearly a number of months after the Book of
Mormon was published.
- *How reliable can a hearsay statement be that is inconsistent with both the
Rigdon and Smith time-lines? According to what "Pearne" allegedly told
Lillie, that during the summer of 1830, in the vicinity of Palmyra, he
supposedly "often saw Rigdon and Smith together." Whereas, with the
Rigdon time-line there is only about a three
week gap, from June to August of 1830, in which Rigdon is unaccounted for in
Ohio, and during that same period of time, Joseph Smith was actually in Harmony,
Pennsylvania, not Palmyra.
- Even were "Pearne" correct both about being well acquainted with
the Smiths and his having seen Rigdon with Smith in the summer of 1830 (which he
clearly is not), how does that support the Spalding theory which asserts that
Rigdon periodically supplied Smith with portions of the Spalding manuscript from
September of 1827 to the spring of 1830? At the very worst it only suggest that
Rigdon (or "Pearne" for that matter) may have been several months off
in his timing of Rigdon's first arrival at Palmyra.
- Apart from the conflict which the Enigma authors' noted in their own "evidence"
("Pearne's" statement about Rigdon leaving with Smith for Ohio in a
buggy conflicts with other historical accounts), do the authors, themselves,
suggest that Garret Purnee of Sodus, Wayne County, New York, is the same person
as, or a close relative of, Jacob Perne, later of Rice Township, Sanduscky
County, Ohio? If so, on what basis do they make this apparent conjecture? (Not
that it matters to the issue at hand)
Back
Last updated 01/28/01