From: davidb@scn.org (David Barts) Newsgroups: alt.society.anarchy,alt.politics.radical-left,talk.politics.misc,pdx.general,seattle.general Subject: The Bush definition of 'uniting America'? NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.178.69.229 Did anyone else catch Ari Fleischer's (sp?) press conference this morning, when he admitted that the Bush administration is going to also press ahead with its original partisan domestic policy agenda despite all the blather they've been spouting about "uniting Americans"? They have apparently just tipped their hand. They care very little about national security and a great deal about amassing power at any and all costs. [Author's Note, added the following day: I was pretty pissed off by those remarks (can you tell?) and in the heat of the moment waxed hyperbolic here. They _do_ care about national security; I don't think anyone honestly _doesn't_ right now. But the calculating, cynical, duplicitous, amassing of power is also a big priority.] I now fear my government as much as those who recently destroyed the WTC. Relevant excerpt from the conference follows. Full text available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010917-8.html . [...] Q What items on the President's legislative agenda are now on the back burner, shelved for the year? MR. FLEISCHER: None. It was interesting -- none. It was interesting, at the meeting last week with the Cabinet, the meeting of the Cabinet was called for the purpose of discussing what the Cabinet members, again, in collecting information from Cabinet Secretaries about the status of combatting the attack on our country and dealing with it. At the end of the meeting, however, the President called on all the members of the Cabinet to take action on our domestic agenda. The President reminded them that a patients' bill of rights remains important; that there are a series of initiatives that are pending up on the Hill that remain important. And he called on them to get done, including education reform, which the President reminded them remains a top priority domestically. Q He doesn't expect to get it, surely? MR. FLEISCHER: You know, Helen, I think it's interesting, the Congress still has a job to do and we still are a constitutional system and that's what has kept us strong and that's what is going to enable us to win. So there is a domestic agenda, the President is committed to it. I think it's fair to say that you'll hear less about it because of the dominance, obviously, of dealing with an attack on our country. But the President told the Cabinet members to be dedicated to it and members of our staff are. [...] Q Can I just follow up on Helen's question. The President would like those issues addressed this year, patients' rights, education and everything that was on the plate, trade promotion authority, still this year? MR. FLEISCHER: That was his charge to the Cabinet members. Q Now, wouldn't that foster some disunity on the Hill? I mean, a lot of those are very contentious issues and he's looking for a united Congress. MR. FLEISCHER: You know, Keith, I guess that's one way to look at it. I don't think that's the way the President looks at it. And I think that in the wake of this there is a different mood in the Congress, and in the Presidency about working with each other and cooperating with each other. So I've made no such presumption. The issue should be, proceed with the people's business on the domestic front and work together. [...] -- David Barts Portland, OR